Dr. Imani ReeveMolecular biologist
Quick thread on the new Nature 2026 paper that's getting misread everywhere, what it shows about CRISPR off-target rates ↓
12k views · 340 reposts · 89 quotes
Mission control for science communication.
Talk your science across your social media accounts.Train your voice.Stay evidence-based.From single creators to research institutions.
fervae.com / dashboard LIVE DEMO
Join the waitlist.
You’ll get early access and occasional launch updates.
Sciencecommunicationhasnevermatteredmore.
Researchers, clinicians, museum communicators, educators, journalists. All making the case on Bluesky, Threads, LinkedIn, every platform that matters. Fervae is mission control.
Dr. Sebastian Ng, MDHematologist
Saw a post claiming sickle cell is "cured." Not yet. The FDA approved one therapy for one population. Here's what that means for patients today.
5.4k likes · 612 reshares
Dr. Ronald GambleAstrophysicist, NASA Goddard
The FY2027 President's Budget Request proposes a 47% cut to NASA Science, 55% to NSF, and 13% to the DOE Office of Science. Comment "SAVE SCIENCE" to send your voice to Congress.
Save Science · April 2026
Aarav SolbergClimate-policy analyst
Methodology matters. The "carbon offsets work" report going around used selective 2018 data and didn't audit chain-of-custody. EPA reply in comments.
1.2k reactions
Henrik VolkovScience journalist
15-minute breakdown of how peer review actually works, with real reviewer comments (anonymized, with permission). Everyone deserves to see this.
94k views · trending in Education
Penelope SatoHigh-school biology teacher
If a graph has no error bars, ask why. If a paper has no methods section, leave. If a headline says "experts prove", they didn't. Evidence accumulates.
22k reposts · pinned
Dr. Theo CastellanosStatistician, Children's Hospital
Quick one on what a p-value is, and isn't. With a coin and a notebook. No background needed.
210k views · 18k saves
Dr. Imani ReeveMolecular biologist
Quick thread on the new Nature 2026 paper that's getting misread everywhere, what it shows about CRISPR off-target rates ↓
12k views · 340 reposts · 89 quotes
Dr. Sebastian Ng, MDHematologist
Saw a post claiming sickle cell is "cured." Not yet. The FDA approved one therapy for one population. Here's what that means for patients today.
5.4k likes · 612 reshares
Dr. Ronald GambleAstrophysicist, NASA Goddard
The FY2027 President's Budget Request proposes a 47% cut to NASA Science, 55% to NSF, and 13% to the DOE Office of Science. Comment "SAVE SCIENCE" to send your voice to Congress.
Save Science · April 2026
Aarav SolbergClimate-policy analyst
Methodology matters. The "carbon offsets work" report going around used selective 2018 data and didn't audit chain-of-custody. EPA reply in comments.
1.2k reactions
Henrik VolkovScience journalist
15-minute breakdown of how peer review actually works, with real reviewer comments (anonymized, with permission). Everyone deserves to see this.
94k views · trending in Education
Penelope SatoHigh-school biology teacher
If a graph has no error bars, ask why. If a paper has no methods section, leave. If a headline says "experts prove", they didn't. Evidence accumulates.
22k reposts · pinned
Dr. Theo CastellanosStatistician, Children's Hospital
Quick one on what a p-value is, and isn't. With a coin and a notebook. No background needed.
210k views · 18k saves
Trustgetsbuiltinpublic,onepostatatime,bythepeoplewhoknowthework.
Every post, a flight log. Every reply, a course correction. Evidence in people's hands, where it can do the work.
US public trust in scientists
0ptpartisan gap, 76% overall
Pew Research, Oct 2024 ↗ · Down from 87% in April 2020. Democrats 90% vs. Republicans 65%.
DEMOCRATS
0%
REPUBLICANS
2020 · 87%0%
Confidence in scientistsrecovered, but still fragile
0%in 2025, recovering
Pew Research, Jan 2026 ↗ · 87% in 2019, fell to 73% in 2021, recovered to 77% by 2025. Still fragile.
201920212025
Speed of misinfo vs. corrections
0×faster, on average
Vosoughi, Roy & Aral, MIT — Science, 2018 ↗ · False claims spread roughly six times faster than corrections.
MISINFO
CORRECTION
Evidence belongs in people's hands.
Missioncontrolforsciencecommunication.
Where communicators plan, practice, and publish their expertise on social media.
01 · Schedule
A place to plan and publish.
- 01One queue, seven platforms.Draft once. Post everywhere. Your voice stays yours on every platform.
- 02Per-platform tuning.Length, tone, image crop, alt text, hashtags. Set sensible defaults, override per post.
- 03A weekly view that breathes.See your week. Move things around. Hit publish on Sunday or stagger across the week.
02 · Engage
A place to practice your voice.
- 01Sentiment-aware reply queue.Curious, supportive, skeptical, hostile, misinformation. Triaged before you open them.
- 02Coaching for clarity.Suggestions tuned for hedging, citation, and plain language.
- 03Quote-and-cite, in one click.Drop a paper, a figure, or a methods snippet straight into a reply.
03 · Lab
A place to source from your own research.
- 01Your library, indexed.Your papers, your collaborators’ work, the journals you read. Pinned next to the post composer.
- 02Cite from the paper.Pull a quote, a figure, or a methods snippet straight from the source, citation auto-attached.
- 03A reading list that listens.Save once. We watch for citing papers, replications, and rebuttals so you don’t have to.
Posts to
- Bluesky
- Threads
- YouTube
- TikTok
First of its kind.
Built around the work.
Schedulers exist. They were built for marketers. We built the first one for science.
Other tools
AI that rewrites your caption.
Training in proven science communication frameworks.
No scholarly sources. Anywhere.
Scholarly sources baked into compose.
Generic sentiment. $399 a seat.
A reply queue that tells skeptical apart from hostile.
RSS feeds of trending articles.
A discovery feed of papers, preprints, and science news.
Sprout Advanced$399per seat
Fervae Pro$29flat
Anexpertvoice,withanaudiencethathearsit.
Audience growth, made honestly. Your sources, your standards, your voice stay where they belong.
Your voice.
Yours. Sharper, clearer, with the receipts in reach.
Your audience.
An audience built post by post on the strength of what you said. Yours to keep.
Your integrity.
Receipts attach themselves. Sources travel with the post. Cite or it didn't happen.
And the time to keep doing the science.
A workflow that fits inside the week. Plan, post, and reply fast. The bench keeps its hours.