Skip to main content

You spent 4 years on this study. Your Instagram caption got 12 likes.

Grad school prepared you for peer review, not social media. Fervae helps you share your research publicly, with citations attached and credibility intact.

I posted about my research on Instagram. Conspiracy theories, hot takes, strangers who didn't read past the headline. I closed the app for two months.

01

Your paper becomes a post, citations included

Discovery Hub surfaces trending research in your field. Draft your post and Fervae generates a source page with DOIs, author lists, and journal references.

  • Publish to Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Bluesky, LinkedIn, and Threads from one dashboard
  • Auto-generated source pages with DOIs and full citations
  • From paper to post in one visual workflow
📡
Discovery Hub

Trending in your field

Gene Editing Efficiency in Neural Progenitor Cells

Nature NeuroPreprint

mRNA Stability Under Thermal Stress Conditions

ScienceDOI

Microplastic Accumulation in Deep-Sea Sediments

PNASDOI

📎fervae.com/s/crispr-lnp-neural
Nature NeuroDOI: 10.1038/...
IG
TT
YT
BS
LI
TH

Published to 6 platforms

Source page live with DOI and author list

Someone misinterpreted my preprint online. I wanted to correct them without sounding condescending, but no one ever trained me for this.

02

Practice the conversation before it happens

Pushback, conspiracy theories, bad-faith arguments. Fervae's communication gym gives you realistic scenarios to practice with.

  • Frameworks like ACE (Affirm, Counter, Explain), Truth Sandwich, and Bridge
  • Scenarios tailored to academic and research contexts
  • Build confidence before you hit publish
🎯
PracticeScenario 5 of 10
🎯

Loading scenario...

👤
just_asking_101hostile

“So you're telling me you know better than everyone? Must be nice having Big Pharma funding your ‘research.’”

Choose a framework

ACE: Affirm → Counter → Explain

Transparent + source-backed. Perfect.

I spend more time responding to bad-faith comments than I do creating content. And I never know if engaging is even worth it.

03

Your comments section, handled

All your comments in one inbox, sorted by type (curious, skeptical, hostile) with framework-guided responses and source links.

  • Every platform in one place
  • Coaching prompts for hostile and skeptical comments
  • Share your source page link instead of typing citations in replies
💬
Inbox4 new
💬

Syncing comments...

All platforms

IG
grad_student_k

Can you share the preprint link?

curious
TT
conspiracyKing

Another paid shill study lol

hostile
YT
ScienceTeacher

Using this in my class tomorrow!

supportive
BS
neuro.postdoc

What was the n for the control group?

curious
BSneuro.postdoccurious

“What was the n for the control group?”

Replied with source page link
0%

of Americans say scientists are intelligent

but only
0%

say scientists communicate well

Source: Pew Research Center, Nov 2024

Simple, transparent pricing

🌱Free
$0/mo

3 accounts, 500 MB, full Discovery Hub

Join the Waitlist
🚀Pro
$29/mo

12 accounts, 5 GB, analytics & coaching

Join the Waitlist
👥Team
$35/seat/mo

Team collaboration, 5 accounts/seat, 5 GB/seat

Join the Waitlist
🏛️Enterprise
Custom

SSO, custom onboarding, priority support

Contact Us

Compare all features →

Your work matters. Make it heard.

Apply for early access to the beta.

Apply for Beta Access